mrmoneymustache.comcommenthomeownerScore: 0
I suspect that there's a bit of a virtuous/vicious cycle here. Houses are a LOT more expensive in Europe, so the additional cost of a heftier roof represents a smaller incremental cost.
This is one of my "bucket list" items when we retire. Design and build (or have built) a really, really high-quality, efficient (in both energy and space) home that will cost hardly anything to condition or maintain.
The ROI of various energy-efficiency approaches is well studied--insulation, roof overhangs, wall construction, heat pumps, solar, etc. What I
haven't
seen as much is analysis of the ROI of making the
layout
more efficient. Fewer square feet means fewer building materials as well as less externally-exposed surfaces. And better architectural details around weatherproofing and material selection can mean a LOT of money saved on maintenance over time.
The funny thing is, though, that our vinyl siding is 18 years old, and we've only had a single piece come off the house in the 12 years we've lived here. No hail damage, no wind damage. It's the cheapest kind of siding, yet it's...just fine.
- Post Date
- 8/18/2023, 2:48:11 PM
- Scraped At
- 3/15/2026, 7:49:24 AM
Metadata
{
"thread_title": "Will home insurance become so uneconomical/awful it makes sense to self-insure?",
"scrape_method": "beautifulsoup"
}