Bodine & Co.|Social Scraper/ca-es-insurance

Deploy: Mar 31, 11:28 PM PDT

California E&S Insurance

active

Homeowner experiences, agent discussions, E&S/surplus lines, and FAIR Plan coverage in California wildfire zones

Overview

Configuration

AudiencesGeographiesKeywordsDiscoverySources
Collect

Results

PostsNewsReportsAnalytics

Operations

Scrape LogImportSettingsRisk Zones
← Back to posts
redditr/RealEstateposthomeownerScore: 0
You do not have to rebuild the home to be paid by the insurance company. However, you may receive less than if you did rebuild. Many homeowners policies (HO-3 and HO-5) offer replacement cost on the home itself. What this means is that even though the home might be older and depreciated, if your home is damaged by a covered peril, they will pay the entire cost to fix the home, not offer a depreciated amount. However, if you don’t rebuild you will receive the depreciated amount. Here is a simple example: Assume a home has a 100 year life span and a straight line depreciation. If the home is 20 years old, it would be considered to be 20% depreciated. Exclusive of land costs, the home originally cost $ 100,000 to build, and there has been no inflation so it would cost the same $ 100K to build an exact duplicate of the home. The home is insured in the amount of $ 100K on an HO-3 with replacement cost on the dwelling. The home is destroyed by fire. If the home is rebuilt, the insurance company would pay $100,000 to rebuild the home. If the homeowner chooses to not rebuild, then the insurance company only will pay $ 80,000.
Source URL
https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1i1ipr2/can_we_use_insurance_money_to_pay_mortgage_if/m76eoe4/
Post Date
1/14/2025, 10:47:38 PM
Scraped At
3/15/2026, 6:21:30 PM

Metadata

{
  "score": 0,
  "title": "",
  "subreddit": "RealEstate",
  "num_comments": 0,
  "scrape_method": "apify_targeted"
}

Scrape Run

reddit — completed — 1246 posts collected